Home | Contact | Location | Disclaimer | Search
 
 
 
  New Visitors
Home
About Us
Partners
Staff
Services
Students
Patient Comments
Quality
Register
Private Appointments
Photos
   
  Patients
Home
Repeat Prescriptions
Book Appointments
Medical Certificates
Out of Hours
Self Help
Travel Clinic
Yellow Fever
   
  Information
Home
Practice Information
Practice Leaflet
Fees
GP Registrars
Tel. Numbers
Freedom of Info.
Complaints
Vacancies
Websites
Pharmacies
Newsletter
 
  Information Box  
 
Doctors Appointments
Nurse Triage
Home Visits
Repeat Prescriptions
How to Register
Test Results
Change of Address
Equal Opportunities
PALS
 
 

 
 
 
 
SOUTH EAST REGION VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOR GENERAL PRACTICE OXFORD DEANERY

VISITING ASSESSORS REPORT


Part 1

1. Trainer Dr. P. von Eichstorff
Address East Oxford Health Centre, Manzil Way, Oxford, OX4 1XD
Date of Visit 6th December 2002


2. Assessors Mrs. Elizabeth Judge
Dr. Martin Wakeford
Dr. Pawan Rander
Dr. Peter Havelock

3. Summary and Recommendation
a) For the Practice: this practice has been through many changes over the last year, doctors, managers, staff and computer and they have managed all these transitions with great aplomb and effectiveness. This is exemplified in the development in the use of their computer. It was only a year ago that they changed to an EMIS system while using Lloyd George notes as their practice records system. Now in less than a year they have an up and running electronic appointment system, they are virtually paperless in their clinical records and there is great consistency in the use of the computer by all the clinical staff. Not only is their clinical use of the computer very impressive but their non-clinical use of the computer by electronic e-mail within and without the practice is exemplary. They have a good tool that they are using well.

The overall impression is that the practice is a very happy place. People like working there and many of the staff have worked there for a very long time. The two newer people to the practice, Ahsan, the Registrar, and Tabitha the Retainee, speak very well of the practice, as do all the attached staff who enjoy their contact with the East Oxford Health Centre. They recently had a practice away day with many objectives and great involvement of all the staff in the discussions and plans.

The practice is obviously patient-centred with good availability of appointments and a high quality of access to all clinicians. They have used their diversity of patients to a strength in the use of health advocates and focussing services on clinical and cultural needs. This leadership comes from the doctors and nurses in the practice.

Clinically we had the impression that there was a high quality of clinical care, both in audits done and acted upon, comparative data with other practices from the Oxford MAAG is favourable and of a high quality with regular clinical guidance meetings and audit meetings with written minutes and plans with individual doctors and nurses taking responsibility for this development. Each of the doctors has a working Personal Development Plan. Although Maggie Perrin, the Practice Manager, has only been in the practice 18 months, she is a real strength, continuing to develop systems within the practice and having an influence in the PCT externally.

Oxford Deanery Practice Criteria: This practice meets all the Oxford Deanery criteria.

Our recommendations for further development:
1) The practice already has an active plan for the computerisation of paper
summaries of past clinical data. There is a very robust system for updating new
summaries and getting clinical data onto the computer. We would support the
activities developed by the practice to get past data on and encourage them in their commitment to keep to an August date line for this. The value of having this information on the computer will reap benefits in further quality work.

2) Though there were good protocols for a number of clinical disease areas many of them were not updated and in some cases clinically out of date. We would encourage the initiative that the practice is in the throes of protocol development and we would encourage them to a) involve all clinicians, b) get as much of this as electronic as possible, c) add quality markers into the protocol development that would link to further audits and so quality assurance in a number of areas is feasible, d) develop working templates and encourage the practice to use these, e) have lead clinicians responsible for driving this through. There is also movement in the practice to develop non-clinical protocols that we would encourage.

3) We were impressed by the development of the practice nurses but they are under a lot of work pressure and would encourage the practice to continue to try and influence the PCT to have more practice nurse time, this might help them include nurse triage within their services. There is also a need within the practice for a clinical audit/information manager/clerk that would help in the quality assurance drive.

4) The whole refurbishment of the East Oxford Health Centre site is a great opportunity for the practice and a new building would be beneficial for all sorts of reasons. The practice is well aware that these changes also might be a threat to some of their strengths, i.e. their cohesiveness, their patient focus and their drive to high quality.

In Conclusion:

The East Oxford Health Centre practice is providing excellent care in a friendly happy atmosphere.

b) For the Trainer

Peter von Eichstorff is a well informed and well prepared trainer. He is well read with many sources of information, both clinical and teaching at his finger tips. He is prepared for training, aware of the issues and has the tools available to him. His fluency at the computer and in the digital use of video recordings will help considerably in this matter. We saw from his teaching, video and discussion of his own consultations that he has insight into his strengths, and indeed his weaknesses and knows what recommendations he would make to himself to improve.

He is well supported by his practice and particularly by Tom Nicholson-Lailey the current trainer and we feel they would be a very strong teaching team with active support of the rest of the practice. He is involved with the Vocational Trainers Scheme in Oxford and planning to become more involved by teaching the Registrars on their day release course.

He meets all the Oxford Deanery criteria for teaching. Our recommendations are few.

1) The community nurses, though very pressed for time, would like to be involved more with teaching and we suggest joint teaching/learning sessions with the Health Visitors and District Nurses together with the other Registrar in the East Oxford Health centre that might save time and be beneficial to all parties.

2) Though there are a lot of books and electronic resources around the practice, and these though listed on a library list, are not as easily searchable or accessible as possible. These could be better categorised and made more readily available to the Registrar.

We found Peter von Eichstorff an effective, enthusiastic teacher and we think Registrars within the East Oxford Health Centre will get a very good deal, both from himself and the practice.

There is a request from the practice to get Tom Nicholson-Lailey and Peter von Eichstorff synchronized so they have the same re-accreditation visit in the future. We feel that Peter von Eichstorff could be reassessed in a little longer time if this made it easier.

We discussed with the practice the possibility of two or more learners in the practice. At present the practice is a little limited for space, although they could easily accommodate an enhanced Registrar or a part time Registrar together with a full time Registrar but would be unable to take two full time Registrars until the new buildings, when the accommodation is completely sorted. We think it is likely that they would be able to take two full time learners in the practice.

Part II

4. Sources of Information

a) Documents OXVT3 Application form, OXVT5 Previous Assessors Report x 2,
OXVT7 Registrar report, OXVT10 Course Organisers report.

b) Partners met
Dr Tarrant Stein, Dr Georgina Robson, Dr Tom Nicholson-Lailey,
Dr Peter von Eichstorff, Dr Kathryn Ward

c) Registrar met
Dr. Ahsanulla Alvi.  Retainer met Dr. Tabitha Winnifrith

d) Principal staff met
Maggie Perrin Practice Manager, Jeanette Rose Senior Nurse, Maureen Cox Practice Nurse, Marie Malloy Receptionist/Clerk, Lorraine Ayres Receptionist/Clerk, Rita Foster Receptionist/Clerk, Trish Goddard Receptionist/Clerk, Heather Patterson Receptionist/Clerk, Christine Williams Receptionist/Clerk, Alison Stubbs Receptionist/Clerk, Rosalie Simpson Receptionist/Clerk, Heather Paterson Phlebotomist, Paman Steer Counsellor, Patricia Glynn District Nurse, Nina Billen District Nurse, Di Rose District Nurse, Gilly O'Mara Health Visitor, Jayne Marshall Health Visitor, Tina Brandon Nursery Nurse

e) Videos seen
Consultation x 2. Tutorial x 1.

Part III

5. The Trainer

a) Professional values
b) Clinical competency

From the records, discussions, videos and general atmosphere within the practice we felt that Dr. Peter von Eichstorff had the highest professional values and clinical competence.

c) Preparation for training
Peter has recently completed the New Trainers Course and got a great deal out of this.  He had done the majority of the work for the certificate but due to family and practice commitments was unable to complete it. We found him very knowledgeable and well prepared for his teaching.

d) Contribution to local scheme and relationship to Course Organiser and Registrar Group.

He is a regular attender at the Oxford Trainers Group and is looking forward to getting involved in the day release course.

e) Relationship to Registrar
Though the current Registrar is the responsibility, of Tom Nicholson-Lailey, Peter has been involved with him throughout his year and enjoys the close contact that he has had with him.

6. The Training

a) Overall aims (and relationship to Priority Objectives)
Peter has clear overall aims based on a number of different texts which he was able to show us and discuss with us.

b) Negotiation of aims, objectives and methods

c) Formative Assessment
He is clear about assessment methods and is thus able to negotiate clear objectives. He is very aware of the different teaching methods and is looking forward to using these with his intended registrar in February.

d) Curriculum planning (initial and continuing)
He has plans about a curriculum that is based on his overall aims and that of the needs of the Registrar.

e) Log (nature and quality)
The current Registrar has a computerised log shared on the practice intranet with his Trainer. This is something that Peter will adopt when he takes over the responsibility of the trainings. He has his own ideas about additions and improvements to this. It is also added to by other members of the practice.

f) Methods, use of resources
In the present training situation the Registrar has regular teaching from other members of the practice. This is something that we would welcome and suggested that the attached staff be involved in this if possible.

Peter is aware of the access to electronic information and intends to use this intensively with his Registrar. A move we would welcome. 

Maggie Perrin joined the Practice 18 months ago after a career in the educational sector.  Her role in the training and development of Registrars - planning and overseeing the  induction into the Practice and facilitating the Primary Health Care team's continuing contact throughout the year in support of the Trainer - is an important, and developing, one.

Maggie has provided training during the year in Practice Finance (the red book, TVPCA and Links) as well as Human Resources, and recognises that there is scope for more formal tutorials from herself and others, particularly in the current climate of change and development in the NHS.

Community Nurses are involved in the Registrar's induction and thereafter the Registrar has access to the nurse-led baby clinics. However, workload and staffing issues currently prevent them from being fully involved in the tutorial programme and they would hope for a more formal involvement, with perhaps the possibility of providing combined teaching for both Health Centre Practices.

g) Communication with team, practice and release course
There is very good communication within the team and a happy friendly place, as reported by all members of the primary health care team.

h) Tutorials (time, technique and value)
Tutorials are protected time and have been found extremely valuable by the current Registrar and he has felt very supported for his summative assessment and is going to continue his project work into enhanced training.

i) Arrangements for Summative Assessment

Part IV

7. The Practice in Training

a) Contribution of Partners, administration and nursing staff
This practice has been a Training Practice for many years and has a very positive attitude towards training and all the partners and staff are involved.

Non-clinical staff participate in the Registrar's induction, discussing their roles with him/her on an individual basis and looking at IT issues. Thereafter there is a continuing range of informal contact and mentoring.

b) Appointment of Registrar
Deanery centred.

c) Workload of Registrar (and practice if appropriate)
The Registrar reported that the workload was very balanced with a lot of time at the beginning for learning and development becoming busier as the year goes on. He feels very able to cope with a normal practice workload but in no way feels that he is being overworked.

d) Arrangements for night and weekend work
At the start of the year the Registrar is on-call for the partners practice for occasional nights, developing after 5 or 6 months to become a member of the Co-operative with a member of the practice always covering.

e) Supervision of clinical practice
All partners help to supervise clinical practice and he felt very supported.

f) Library (quality and use)
There are a number of books within the practice, in different rooms with reasonably comprehensive library in the Registrars room. We suggest that clearer cataloguing of these would be helpful, together with a greater sharing of medical websites that the Registrar might find useful.

g) Working environment - clinical, training (room for Registrar)
Though at first sight the working environment of East Oxford Health Centre seems rambling, dated and crowded it is an environment that provides all that is necessary  but the practice are looking forward to future plans for the redevelopment of the site and being able to have better premises. The Registrar has his own room.

8. The Practice as a deliverer of Health Care

a) Acute care (and emergencies)

b) Chronic care

c) Preventative medicine
From the records systems, protocols, use of templates and audits we felt that the clinical care in the practice was of a high level. We checked the care of diabetics within the practice and although the IDD patients are looked after by the hospital the non-IDD patients were all up to date with a high quality of care reported in the records.

Receptionists actively manage the appointment system and responsibility for its smooth operation has recently been devolved to Marie Malloy in her new role as Patient Services Manager. A proportion of appointments are pre-booked for acute need and released on the same day. Additional morning 'extras' are logged on a 'Doctors Extra' clinic providing a 'sit and wait' clinic of 5-minute appointments which are shared between the GPs. Additional evening 'extras' are seen opportunistically. The Registrar participates in this system.

Visits are recorded on the visits screen and are normally assigned to the 'usual doctor'.

A nurse-led telephone triage clinic has been a success, but to develop the full potential of this service nursing resources will need to increase.

9. Data Handling

a) Records, type and quality, including visitors check audit

b) Computer and use
The practice has changed over the last 12 months from Lloyd George MREs to fully computerised, with computerised appointments system and all clinical entries being recorded on computer and the notes kept in the filing cabinet for the majority of consultations. Our audit confirms that the practice has each clinical entry on the computer that the summarisation in the practice has a system for including these which is robust, they have about 30 of back data on the computer but when we checked the paper records they had accurate summaries on the paper. They have staff employed and their plan is to have all the paper records transferred to computer by August 2003.

From the evidence of changes over the last year we are certain that this will happen.

c) Audit activity
The practice has done a number of audits with the support of Oxford MAAG using MiQuest. Their figures make very good comparison with other practices in central Oxford. They are looking forward to having complete back data on the computer to enable them to create their own figures in chronic disease areas related to the protocols that are in development. See recommendations.

The Practice Manager feels that an additional staffing resource - audit clerk-is needed if the Practice is to maintain up-to-date audit and statistical information.

Part V

10. Management function

a) Decision making (planning, implementation, evaluation)
Maggie is developing her role and has helped steer the Practice through a period of immense change with a new Partner and Practice Nurse, and building developments providing extra office and waiting room space as well as an additional consulting room. The patient database has been transferred from their original system to EMIS (and not without problems of data loss/corruption), the Practice has become virtually paper less and e-mail is being fully exploited. The next year will bring further challenges as the team begins to implement the development plan resulting from the Practice 'Away-Day' in September, and assimilates the wider changes within the NHS that will provide the catalyst for further development.

The Practice is a very cohesive and patient-centred group committed to a high level of patient care. Partners, Registrar and Practice Manager meet regularly to plan and monitor development and everyone is invited to participate in regular meetings that encourage individual involvement in strategic as well as day-to-day management issues: weekly PHCT meetings, weekly Receptionist/Admin meetings to which Nurses are invited every third week and which GPs may also attend, depending on the topic under review.

The team is involved in clinical governance issues and significant event analysis, building on an established tradition of informal and supportive brainstorming of problems. The Registrar is involved in the planning, decision-making and communication process from the outset.

b) Organisation and systems
The Practice team is headed by Maggie Perrin and is a well managed and professional organisation. Maggie is well supported by the Partners, who each lead in specific areas; she is very appreciative, too, of the support given by staff when first joining the Practice and the way they have responded to change. The entire team is committed to ensuring that the Practice runs smoothly and efficiently to provide a good service to patients, and maintain a tidy, welcoming and relaxed environment.

The Practice has become fully computerised during the past year, and all consultations, prescribing and appointments are computerised, as are registration and 10S links to the HA. Links to the path labs will be activated when the new encryption service becomes available to the Practice; there is also NHS net/e-mail access.

An ongoing development is the summarising of patient records - following the data transfer to the new system plans are in place, supported by a one-year grant, to check/replace corrupted data to enable a clear and accurate patient record. All targets are met, although sometimes only the lower target in the case of children's immunisations and ways of ensuring a higher take-up are being examined. Robust systems are in place, supported by protocols and manuals, but Maggie expects to review these during the coming year.

The Practice has recently been assessed for Quality Team Development and is waiting for the final report. The team found it a very positive and worthwhile experience in that it highlighted the Practice's strengths and priority areas for
development (which the PHCT is now keen to take forward) and provided an excellent preparation for this training assessment

c) Staffing structure and legal aspects
Staff turnover is low and a proportion of staff have enjoyed working in the Practice for many years. Staff have contracts of employment and job description and the appraisal process for staff, access to external courses, in-house training, and 'away-days' are seen as an essential component of personal development and the attainment of a satisfying working environment. Individuals demonstrate support and respect for each other and positive attitudes to change and development.

d) Working environment - administration
Additional space, provided by recent building works, an imaginative use of existing space and a comfortable reception area provide an attractive and welcoming environment for staff, patients and visitors alike.

e) Future
Ultimately the PCT are planning to redevelop the whole site through the Local
Improvement Finance Trust (LIFT) initiative, designed to attract capital investment.

This is some way ahead but will bring new challenges for this team.

11. Other features.

 
 
 

© 2006 Bartlemas Surgery   Website design Internet-GP